Project Leviathan: Modular Hydroelectric Generator

Background and technical details

This project began as a part of a fascination with turbines spawned by the XM116 project, and thus can initially be considered an extension from it to further expand my understanding of fluid dynamics. The simplicity of this project was short lived, and it quickly evolved into a more functional concept that would retain an emphasis on rugged, simple design. After 2 early generations that were driven by theoretical concepts and free from functional limitations, the eventual mission statement for the project would be established as the following; ‘A compact, rugged, modular and self contained hydroelectric turbine generator’.

A significant piece of this project that would keep me invested over the many years that it persisted beyond a simple exercise in part and assembly design was the idea of Turbulence Induction Pattered Surfaces (TIPS). The concept of TIPS and it’s application was derived from a lesson I recieved from a fluid dynamics class that I’d taken at the turn of the decade wherein a demonstration compared the boundary layer behaviors of turbulent and laminar water flows over an object, as well as over a flat plane. At the same time, I was becoming aware of the relationships between certain fluid variables and how said variables affected the Reynolds Number (the Newtonian variable that determines whether a fluid is laminar or turbulent). I inferred that it should be possible to induce turbulence over the back face, also referred to as the drag face, of a turbine by increasing the surface area of said face. This would contribute to a higher Reynolds Number, thus inducing turbulence to tighten the boundary layer of the working fluid, in this case water, to decrease the stall zone of the turbine at a given fluid velocity. This would functionally allow the turbine to operate at a lower fluid velocity, therefore increasing the range of ideal operating conditions of the turbine.

To build further on this theory of TIPS, the entire inside of the outer wall was covered in this texture for a similar effect of reducting the boundary layer and increasing the operating range of the turbine. However, the functional consequence of this aspect was two-fold. Firstly, this served to increase the flow velocity at the radially outward-most portion of the blade, which would increase the torque applied to the blade at any given fluid velocity, and therefore increase output voltage. Secondly, it would increase the efficiency of a coaxially mounted second turbine by preserving the shortened boundary layer.

To further speak on this second turbine, it was created as a perfect mirror of the first turbine for a contra-rotating configuration and take advantage of the lateral deflection of fluid off of the first turbine.

Structural Design Philosophy

This project truly embodied a design philosophy at the time that I called ‘Right to Exist’. In short, Right to Exist dictates that all elements of a design must be defensible to scrutiny, as well as serve multiple functions wherever possible. For example, the Inlet and Outlet both serve the following functions:

  • A structural element to keep the center screw aligned axially
  • A structural element to defend a rigid form in the case of blunt force impacts
  • A fluid guide to correct the incoming flow of water and optimally allow it to flow over the turbines
  • A orientation correction mechanism for the entire generator to naturally orient to upstream of any flowing body of water
  • A hydrofoil which will guide the generator immediately below the surface of the water, thus positioning the device at the point of hypothetically highest fluid velocity.

This design philosophy prompted dozens of iterations on all components. Other examples include the stator, which serves to both stiffen the axial core of the device to maintain alignment perfectly with the centerline of the generator, retain the generator stators positions around the turbines, and a fluid corrector between the first and second turbine to further improve the performance of the second turbine. The generator stator, also referred to as a squirrel-cage, both serves to derive electrical power from the rotation of the turbines, but also to provide a hard inner reinforcement for the outershell, and a spacer to stiffen the entire axial length of the device. Even the center screw chosen to run axially through the core of the entire device both serves its’ obvious function as a fastener, but also as an alignment tool by which an assembler or user can easily use as a guide to quickly assemble and service the generator.

As a result of this rigorous design verification process, the total part count of the device was reduced to 7 individual injection molded components, 6 of which are unique, and of these unique parts, 3 of which are compatible with the Leviathans’ sister project; the Leviathan Mini. The Leviathan mini, in short, is meant to use the same parts as the Leviathan, namely the same outlet, either turbine, and outer shell, with the only unique component being an inlet.

Marketing, Problems and Termination

When the design work was completed, I sought help from two people in my life that I respected as experts in different areas with regards to this project. Doug Patton, the founder of Patton Design Inc. and my former boss, and Andrew Blue, my uncle and business owner.

I first sought help from my uncle for advice as to seek monetary aid from investors. He gave me a fairly simple and achievable list of objectives to accomplish which would culminate in a project proposition that I could send and present to investors. However, in doing more in depth research on the markets that the generator would reveal a criteria wherein a customer would need to belong to one of 3 very niche groups:

  • Offroad or adventure ebike enthusiasts
  • Long term or nomadic base camp settlers
  • covert military personel

These groups do exist in their own very limited groups, but the unfortunate criteria that all of these groups would need to qualify for in order to consider a product like those in the Leviathan generator series is a concern for the environment as well as a lack of better alternatives. The truth of the matter was that all of these groups had better alternatives for extra power. Due to the fairly bulky and heavy frame of the generator, the ebike group would be better served using the same cargo space to carry extra batteries and a small solar recharger. For the case camp group, they would likely have the carrying capacity of transport vehicles to carry a proper generator and fuel to provide a more flexible means of electricity. Covert military operations was eventually the last likely group that would seriously consider such a generator due to the Leviathans’ completely silent mechanism and simplicity. However, due to the niche use case in which an operator would require long term power, as well as the notoriously slow process for the US military to adopt new equipment, the monetary investment required to make this project work on a commercial scale ultimately did not make sense to pursue.

Conclusion

Project Leviathan was officially terminated in February 2023 after roughly 3 months of stagnation during my university senior project. In the end, I concluded that I’d learned as much as I could and taken away as much as I was ever going to from this 6 year endeavor and pursuing it any further would be a foreseeable waste in investment for which I’d adequately researched. Several prototypes of the turbines were 3D Printed from both FDM and MSLA machines, and 2 form prototypes were completed to illustrate the eventual size of the Leviathan generator.

I would walk away from this project with an understanding of the project lifecycle and product management process, how to laisse with manufactures and 3rd party suppliers, and thanks to my conversations with Doug Patton, an understanding of the patenting process. In addition, I was able to learn from my mistakes in retrospect and determine what defines a good mission statement with a clear and well-defined objective, as well as how to conduct the early stages of product development and conception. As such, I personally view this project as an unrivalled success that was taken as far as it could go.